N years have seen a movie Nanjing Massacre, the lens has a very dark scenes of the brutality of the war and genocide, has given me deep stimulation, which was often thought to feel horror. Since then, I never watched war movies.
Last night to see the recent hubbub about the "Nanjing, Nanjing," really down a boss's determination to read as many condemned the film before director Lu Chuan's article, from a curiosity - some people forget that all Chinese history of humiliation, it can be beautified it?
Wangfujing is still full staff, ticket queues, I bought the tickets and, like last time, still is 2 hours later - this is a coincidence or necessity can not explain. All people seem to Changsha is located in the busiest section of this theater entertainment - people are really busy which Changsha, Changsha people are really petty bourgeoisie, the people will never see the film so much.
We still and, like last time, night market, eat supper, unwittingly, two hours later.
I began to feel that the film shown to them before, there should be two hours so people wandering, how good time: to see the streets of neon; visiting the stalls; the coins thrown into a gray-haired old beggar in front of the Po Wan , because she reminds me of the grandmother died; gathered to watch a pair of father and daughter playing tricks, watch the way his father pulled into the erhu, his children happily playing in the side, this dignified begging, so I'm filled a tribute; later we sat an alley called the East Mau Street, eating spicy snacks, I have sunglasses, because people do not want to recognize.
Blend into the real marketplace, I think the heart having peace of mind, every nerve is full, so good, will not empty too painful.
Pain, is a later thing.
2 hours of film, I had far less pain, only 2 hours.
Back, a friend asked about the movie good or bad depends, I think for a long time can not be worded, can only sigh: this film, how to evaluate the use of the word beautiful?
Can only use a heavy, heavy to heavy life unbearable.
I think people began to beautify the Japanese soldiers Lu Chuan, glorify war accusations.
I can understand people's accusations.
Lu Chuan, but I want to say a word: he has his shot so considered.
In today's volatile international situation, China-Japan relations have been strained by war situation, he could intensify the conflict? Even if he would like to intensify this conflict, film can not be reviewed through the Film Board.
Should this film shot? Lu Chuan was accused by the tragic history in the commercial hype, not for patriotic purposes, this I do not entirely agree. Anyway, to make this film, so that Hari, Kazakhstan and South Korea are familiar with the new generation would not learn in class history, bearing in mind the humiliation, than all the chatter of the boring white preaching - this number is an extremely important one things.
Consider the box office in the business of the times, considering the operation should also be subject to pressure from investors, they had to co-existence, know this, Lu Chuan is a Chinese, he was the same as this Lishi in pain.
He glorifies soldiers it?
Personally, I think, no.
Japanese soldiers are people like us, perhaps thousands of years ago is still the same ancestor. Human nature in some of their stuff, we also have. With the human, who is more cruel than anyone else? Lu Chuan, but is objectively demonstrate their humanity, it should not be called the landscaping, it is a fact, that's all. The reason why we can not accept, can only say that we do not know enough of the war, over the years has been used to vilify the Japanese extreme.
Nanjing Massacre cruel, cruel is the war itself, not the cruel Japanese. In life and death on the battlefield, you do not cruel, cruel enemy, you will; you do not kill, the enemy will be killed. Although the massacre itself is basically against unarmed innocent people, but Zuo Wei Fang of the Japanese war were considered to Qude the victory, we must first Cuihui our morale, Nanjing You is what the Chinese Capital - massacre, became one of their strategic plan. This deployment is not aimed at people in Nanjing, but the entire war.
This deployment, our ancient history when European and Asian expeditions of Genghis Khan Proud Son of Heaven, the modern history of the army returned fire in self-defense against Vietnam war, Korean War, have been used; this deployment, embodied in the relentless war is the whole human cruel; this deployment, the Nanjing Massacre is the most insane and cruel one, and this time the Japanese were eager to control the situation, the end of the war, eager to win the; also with Nanjing, the then Japanese troops attack 2 and 6 Division soldiers are mainly workers in Japan have a significant relationship, in fact, the Nanjing Massacre to the later, there is no way to control Japan.
In fact, any war is inevitable in such a situation: soldiers, dog eat dog, crazy desire to vent, brutality unprecedented exposure, the situation is just like a flood, out of control, combined with our government abandoned too quickly, resulting in the Nanjing City's loss and the laissez-faire, and more to stimulate the brutal and wanton soldiers.
He glorifies war?
I still think, no.
He just selectively choose some war scenes, as the most bloody cruel, most vividly in film, how many negative effects? Moreover, too much blood and violence, too humiliating scene, before the film has been shot several times, and you still want to see you, go see it? How more and more scrutiny by now? For any person to do the director, are not too bloody shooting scene, at least make a more artistic treatment.
I would think, another new perspective of the Nanjing Massacre, the significance of film are more shooting.
We attempt to reproduce the video and complete the real war, or even made into a documentary, to achieve the ideological education of future generations of patriotism, it is unrealistic, the film is an art in any case, it will always have a realistic distance, our patriotic education, should be in the classroom, in the classroom, in textbooks. Moreover, the Nanjing Massacre documentary already had, why repeat? Not all history has to be made into a documentary.
没有评论:
发表评论